Mephis:
"It's the WBTS' inherent secrecy which is the issue here, and it's that which has to be broken down if we're going to see them have effective child safeguarding which really should be the aim."
I entirely agree.
the sunday programme investigates allegations that the jehovah's witness ordered the destruction of documents that could be used during the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse.
was this in contravention of section 21 of the inquiries act 2005 which is punishable by imprisonment?.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0709v34.
Mephis:
"It's the WBTS' inherent secrecy which is the issue here, and it's that which has to be broken down if we're going to see them have effective child safeguarding which really should be the aim."
I entirely agree.
the sunday programme investigates allegations that the jehovah's witness ordered the destruction of documents that could be used during the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse.
was this in contravention of section 21 of the inquiries act 2005 which is punishable by imprisonment?.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0709v34.
Oh dear. I don't think this can be right.
Newport cong don't process any personal information apart from CCTV images, they say. So, no records of cong members, no records of publishers' hours, no records of JCs, - well, you get the idea.
Naughty Newport - but at least they registered (bet it was only 'cos they have CCTV). Very few other congs have (search at ICO).
the sunday programme investigates allegations that the jehovah's witness ordered the destruction of documents that could be used during the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse.
was this in contravention of section 21 of the inquiries act 2005 which is punishable by imprisonment?.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0709v34.
And here's the entry for Newport Gwent congregation:
Data Protection Register - Entry Details |
Registration Number: ZA097437
Date Registered: 29 January 2015 Registration Expires: 28 January 2017
Data Controller: Newport North Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses
Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses
Penkin Hill
Newport
Gwent
NP19 9NX
Other Names:
Unknown
This register entry describes, in very general terms, the personal data being processed by:
Newport North Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses
Nature of work - Religious Worship and related activities
Description of processing
The following is a broad description of the way this organisation/data controller processes personal information. To understand how your own personal information is processed you may need to refer to any personal communications you have received, check any privacy notices the organisation has provided or contact the organisation to ask about your personal circumstances.
Reasons/purposes for processing information
We do not process personal information. We only use Camera Images to protect access to the site against those intent on criminal activities or intent on causing harm.
Type/classes of information processed
I process information relevant to the above reasons/purposes. This information may include:
I also process sensitive classes of information that may include:
Who the information is processed about
Anyone accessing the Kingdom Hall
Who the information may be shared with
Possibly only the Police if it became necessary
Where required by law, I share information with healthcare, social and welfare organisations.
CCTV for crime prevention
CCTV is used for maintaining the security of property and premises and for preventing and investigating crime, For these reasons the information processed may include visual images, personal appearance and behaviours. This information may be about offenders and suspected offenders, members of the public and those inside, entering or in the immediate vicinity of the area under surveillance. Where necessary or required this information is shared with the data subjects themselves, and police forces, making an enquiry.
Transfers
© Copyright |
the sunday programme investigates allegations that the jehovah's witness ordered the destruction of documents that could be used during the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse.
was this in contravention of section 21 of the inquiries act 2005 which is punishable by imprisonment?.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0709v34.
Mephis:
I was disappointed with Rosenberg's comments. He seemed to have missed the point, and got it wrong re paper records.
the sunday programme investigates allegations that the jehovah's witness ordered the destruction of documents that could be used during the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse.
was this in contravention of section 21 of the inquiries act 2005 which is punishable by imprisonment?.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0709v34.
So there you have it.. When you join the organisation (JWs) you are agreeing to the above data collection, retention and sharing.
How many 'bible studies' are made aware of this? I could make a guess.
the sunday programme investigates allegations that the jehovah's witness ordered the destruction of documents that could be used during the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse.
was this in contravention of section 21 of the inquiries act 2005 which is punishable by imprisonment?.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0709v34.
Here is the Data Protection registration for WT UK:
Data Protection Register - Entry Details |
Registration Number: Z5281400
Date Registered: 16 February 2001 Registration Expires: 15 February 2017
Data Controller: INTERNATIONAL BIBLE STUDENTS ASSOCIATION
IBSA HOUSE
THE RIDGEWAY
LONDON
NW7 1RN
This register entry describes, in very general terms, the personal data being processed by:
INTERNATIONAL BIBLE STUDENTS ASSOCIATION
Nature of work - Charity (National)
Description of processing
The following is a broad description of the way this organisation/data controller processes personal information. To understand how your own personal information is processed you may need to refer to any personal communications you have received, check any privacy notices the organisation has provided or contact the organisation to ask about your personal circumstances.
Reasons/purposes for processing information
We process personal information to enable us to provide a voluntary service for the benefit of the national public as specified in our constitution; administer membership records; to fundraise and promote the interests of the charity; manage our employees and volunteers; maintain our own accounts and records. Our processing also includes the use of CCTV systems for the prevention of crime.
Type/classes of information processed
We process information relevant to the above reasons/purposes. This may include:
We also process sensitive classes of information that may include:
Who the information is processed about
We process personal information about:
Who the information may be shared with
We sometimes need to share the personal information we process with the individual themself and also with other organisations. Where this is necessary we are required to comply with all aspects of the Data Protection Act (DPA). What follows is a description of the types of organisations we may need to share some of the personal information we process with for one or more reasons.
Where necessary or required we share information with:
Transfers
It may sometimes be necessary to transfer personal information overseas. When this is needed information may be transferred to countries or territories around the world. Any transfers made will be in full compliance with all aspects of the data protection act.
© Copyright |
the sunday programme investigates allegations that the jehovah's witness ordered the destruction of documents that could be used during the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse.
was this in contravention of section 21 of the inquiries act 2005 which is punishable by imprisonment?.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0709v34.
Landy:
Yes, charities and not-for-profits are included under the Data Protection Act in England & Wales.
the sunday programme investigates allegations that the jehovah's witness ordered the destruction of documents that could be used during the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse.
was this in contravention of section 21 of the inquiries act 2005 which is punishable by imprisonment?.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0709v34.
In relation to the destruction of material ...
In relation to 'special procedure material' under PACE 1984, i.e. material (documents etc.) held by a party (e.g. a bank, accountant, whatever) under a duty of confidence, this was only obtainable by an investigator (constable etc) under a Production Order from a Circuit Judge. When making an application for a PO, notice was given to the holder of the material so that they could appear before the judge to argue the PO if they wished. The notice always pointed out to the holder of the material that - having been put on notice about the material - the material was therefore protected from destruction etc. under the law.
My point is this. Lawyers know about this sort of stuff. They will be very well aware of the general notice given by HHJ Goddard even if a specific notice was not served on WTBTS/IBSA UK (and I don't yet know whether a notice was served or not, perhaps WT was too small to be included). But an admitted Solicitor or a Barrister will have no excuse whatsoever.
I suspect that right now there are frenzied communications going back and forth between UK and US (just as I;m sure there were similar communications between Australia and US during the ARC hearings).
We all saw (and the world has seen) what a complete horlicks the WT made of the ARC hearings. The current climate in the UK regarding historic abuse does not bode well for the WT if it continues to obfuscate. I, for one, wouldn't want to be an elder hung out to dry for my actions - or even for shredding my notes.
the sunday programme investigates allegations that the jehovah's witness ordered the destruction of documents that could be used during the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse.
was this in contravention of section 21 of the inquiries act 2005 which is punishable by imprisonment?.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0709v34.
Cofty:
Thanks for your kind comment. I am not a qualified lawyer, but in my former career was quite specialised and was able to guide prosecution lawyers, IYSIM. Certainly in conference with barristers, incl. QCs, the discussion was between equals. However, I have been retired for ten years and so my knowledge is not current so I am always open to correction.
I was intrigued by the shambles of evidence that the WT put forward at the ARC hearings. WT knew what they were going to be asked and I would have expected a multi-million dollar corporation to have prepared better. Toole, as the lead lawyer in Australia, was -to be honest - a joke. I have arrested, interviewed and had convicted far sharper lawyers than him in small towns in Wales - and he was national legal adviser!
I don't know whether WT took this on board, but it should have done. The shenanigans surrounding Jackson's appearance before ARC was a big deal. Watch the WT lawyer (the real one, not Toole) squirm and apologise to HHJ explaining that he had been misled by the WY head honchos. This does not happen very often and it really is a big deal.
I wonder whether WT HQ and its lawyers, sitting in the US, have really grasped what they're dealing with. My limited knowledge of US federal law suggests that there is a sort of blanket immunity for religions under the constitution, and certainly the weight of religious vote is important. That's not the case in the UK (or in Australia) and religious organisations generally have no ;get of jail free' card.
More to follow ...
the sunday programme investigates allegations that the jehovah's witness ordered the destruction of documents that could be used during the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse.
was this in contravention of section 21 of the inquiries act 2005 which is punishable by imprisonment?.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0709v34.
Phizzy:
Thanks for your comment. I'm sure that my views/opinions/comments are of no more consequence than those of anyone else, but if they come back to me I am happy to back them up with references and examples.